November 24, 2024 The Best Source of News, Culture, Lifestyle for Culver City, Mar Vista, Del Rey, Palms and West Los Angeles

Column: No Need for a ‘Tsar,’ the Need Is Results in Getting the Homeless off the Streets of LA & Venice Now!

By Nick Antonicello

Venice resident Michael Rapkin’s awkward and highly controversial premise that a single position or individual can somehow solve the homeless epidemic here in Los Angeles is an absurdity that cannot be taken seriously!

Rapkin, a former member of the Homeless Committee of the Venice Neighborhood Council (www.venicenc.org) has been an ongoing apologist of leaving the homeless on the streets of Venice, a position most Venetians summarily reject as ridiculous. 

Instead of addressing the current homeless formula of “housing first and treatment second,” Mr. Rapkin places his faith in a “one-size-fits-all” appointment of a homeless tsar, accountable to no one, especially the taxpaying public! 

For what he doesn’t address is the current relationship between service providers and LAHSA (Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority), the super agency created in 1993 to tackle homelessness with its 325 employees, 830 individuals and 240 teams designated for nearly thirty years to provide sensible outreach or at least manage this out-of-control epidemic and catastrophic public policy failure! 

Mr. Rapkin fails to mention that LAHSA is headed by Heidi Marston, the $260,000 per year executive director that reports to a bureaucratic, 10-member commission of county and city officials whose job it is to provide oversight from an elected official’s perspective charged to implement policies that would in fact change the face of homelessness here in Los Angeles. 

For we already have someone in charge, but are they accountable and getting the job done? 

The answer is obvious, no!

The agency has been a failure because there are no standards, goals or objectives driven by data to address the core of the problem. 

LAHSA relies on volunteers versus it’s own staff to provide any accuracy to the real time count of those living on our streets. 

Even the federal government hires temporary workers to ensure an honest and reliable US Census count. 

Why does LAHSA not do the same?

While Mr. Rapkin, long an apologist of the homeless here in Venice, where are the statistics or driven data that supports his assumptions and opinions? 

For this failed policy far has been to “shower” this human disgrace with money that for the most part has been spent, but where are the results and where are units of housing?

Consider the following: 

  • The federal government spends $9 billion annually on homeless services
  • The State of California spends $7.2 billion annually on homeless services
  • LAHSA will manage $800 million with $366 million from LA County and $303 million from LA City government 
  • The federal government kicks in $37 million to LAHSA and $95.3 million from California state government
  • Only 0.3% of LAHSA funding is privately funded, less than $2 million dollars! 

There are roughly 553,000 homeless individuals in the United States of which about 161,000 live in California and another 92,000 in the state of New York. 

27% of all homeless in the US live in California and 17% in New York. 

Basically,  half the homeless population lives in two states (44%) with the rest in Florida (28,000), Texas (26,000), Washington (22,000), Massachusetts (18,000), Oregon (16,000) and Pennsylvania (13,000). 

In 2020, 41,290 homeless individuals lived in LA and roughly 2,500 here in Venice. 

The total homeless population represents less than 1% of the entire state of California (0.4%). 

But how is it that California as a state represents 12% of the entire US population, but 22% of the homeless here in America? 

For the assumptions about homeless are just that, assumptions that are not based in any sense of statistical reality. 

Secondly, Mr. Rapkin does not even attempt to address the cost of construction which is now an astounding $837,000 per unit (studio apartments designed for a single dweller) and the government bureaucrats and  allied service providers insist on building this housing in the most expensive locales such as the impending construction of the Reese-Davidson debacle, that has little if any community support here in Venice. 

In fact, Mr. Rapkin calls for “fast tracking” this construction without requiring community hearings or “the ability of people to stand in the way of local projects.” 

In other words, he feels a “tsar,” a pre-1917 Russian Revolution “emperor” of sorts with wide-ranging authority and powers accountable to no one and appointed by some politician is the answer to this tragedy in government’s complete failure with all this funding to actually make the problem worse than it was before the formation of LAHSA? 

For Mr. Rapkin seemingly doubts democracy and direct accountability in solving the issue of homelessness and wants to further empower and insulate the bureaucrats and service providers from any public scrutiny and further squandering of even more tax dollars? 

It is this kind of failed logic and inability to acknowledge the obvious, that the current principles and assumptions of homelessness are 100% wrong, and that the current bloated bureaucracy of LAHSA must be dismantled and replaced with a data-driven approach that solves and no longer enables and apologizes for the cottage industry of homelessness! 

We have witnessed the evacuation and migration of nearly four million Ukraine refugees to neighboring countries such as Poland in the midst of military exercises and war imposed by Russia in a single month. 

These individuals are not homeless. 

They are receiving the help they need and why is it that Los Angeles cannot move to shelter a miniscule fraction of that population? 

And most importantly, why is the fact that 30% of all homeless suffer from severe mental illness and between 30-40% are alcoholic with another 10-15% drug-addicted and unless these issues are addressed first, how can homelessness be seriously solved? 

And finally, according to The New York Times 36% of those homeless are out-of-state transients, another fact Mr. Rapkin would never address regarding this mobility and the magnet California and specifically Venice has become because of the colossal failure of the current homeless policies at the local, county, state and federal levels.

The author is a member of the Oceanfront & Outreach Committees of the Venice Neighborhood Council, and can be reached via e-mail at nantoni@mindspring.com

in Opinion
Related Posts

Letter to the Editor: Criticizing Israeli Policy Is Not Antisemitic

July 10, 2024

July 10, 2024

In the past several months, we’ve seen increasing protests against Israel’s actions in Gaza. We have also seen these protests...

Opinion: Toxic Exposure May Impact Veterans’ Health Even Today

April 29, 2024

April 29, 2024

By Cristina Johnson  Military service members spend years in hazardous environments unknowingly, often developing fatal illnesses decades after their service....

If You Have a Loved One Experiencing Severe Mental Illness, We Can Help

February 15, 2024

February 15, 2024

By Lisa H. Wong, Psy. D Many families across Los Angeles County know what it’s like to watch a loved...

New Program Can Help Protect Southern California Homes in the Event of an Earthquake

May 13, 2023

May 13, 2023

Residents Have Until May 31 To Apply For Seismic Retrofit Grants By Janiele Maffei, Chief Mitigation Officer for the California...

Column: Install at LAX Tiny Homes From The State Grant

April 7, 2023

April 7, 2023

By Clark Brown On March 16  Governor Newsom announced in Sacramento, his first stop on his State of the State of...

Column: SB 9 Ended R-1 Zoning, but It’s Not Meeting Goals

March 11, 2023

March 11, 2023

By Tom Elias More than a year after it took effect, the landmark housing density law known as SB 9...

Column: The Inevitable Conversions Begin Multiplying

February 25, 2023

February 25, 2023

By Tom Elias It’s a phenomenon from New York to Dallas to Fresno and Los Angeles, one that seemed inevitable...

Column: The Fantasy World of California Housing Policy

February 20, 2023

February 20, 2023

By Tom Elias If you’re looking for sure things among bills under consideration in the state Legislature, think of one...

Column: State Usurping Key Powers From Cities

January 28, 2023

January 28, 2023

By Tom Elias All over California last fall, hundreds of the civic minded spent thousands of hours and millions of...

Column – A California Positive: Kids Swarm Extra Classes

January 24, 2023

January 24, 2023

By Tom Elias It’s become a cliché, the shibboleth that California has lousy public schools and most of the kids...

​​Column: No One Very Pleased as New Rooftop Solar Rules Improve

December 9, 2022

December 9, 2022

By Tom Elias, Columnist Only rarely does the California Public Utilities Commission, long known as the least responsive agency in...

Column: Will New Political Players Offer More Effective Local Government for Los Angeles & Venice?

December 5, 2022

December 5, 2022

Bass, Park could become unlikely allies in fighting homelessness, rising crime and the quality-of-life issues that plague both Angelenos and...

Column – Gas Gougers Beware: California Is Onto You at Last

November 11, 2022

November 11, 2022

By Tom Elias It has taken more than 50 years of on-and-off gasoline price gouging, but at long last California...

$87,581,047.01: Candidate Rick Caruso on Pace to Smash All Spending Records in His Bid to Become Mayor of Los Angeles

November 4, 2022

November 4, 2022

Caruso overwhelming Bass nearly 10-1! By Nick Antonicello According to the LA Ethics Commission as of October 31st, billionaire developer...

“Ten Takes” to Watch as CD-11 Hopefuls Park & Darling Close out the Campaign in a Mad Dash to the Finish Line!

November 4, 2022

November 4, 2022

By Nick Antonicello And after some sixteen months of posturing, positioning and intensive campaigning be it door to door, shaking...